Wartime Media - Ukraine / Russia / China / Etc

❗️— Footage shows a Russian aircraft-type drone on fiber optic cable, flying towards Liman. It was previously reported that a modification of the "Molniya" drones on fiber optic cable had appeared, capable of flying at a distance of up to 50 km.

The moment of dropping a hydroacoustic buoy by the Tu-142MK during the encounter with the r F-35B,— Norwegian Sea.

From behind, directly on the ankle (Don't usually post about sports but Trump getting involved in a world cup is just sad)

🇷🇺❌🇺🇦 — Russian artillery from the Yuzhnaya Group of Forces struck Ukrainian positions near Alekseyevo-Druzhkovka, preventing troops retreating from Konstantinovka from establishing new defensive lines.

Andrey X - Israel is launching a campaign to take over the northern West Bank, establishing new settlements and military bases. The villages around Jenin are suffering more and more settler attacks, while the refugee camps remain empty. https://t.co/P04s2tAqJy

Pavlograd Minus a truck. It’ll save you the hassle of backing it up.

Nikolai Patrushev on who Russia is fighting

An Israeli soldier throws a stun grenade into a car carrying a Palestinian family, trapping them inside to absorb the blast. Reports confirm one of the children inside is now permanently blinded for life.

◾Jerusalem’s Archbishop tells vile abuse he faces from Jewish ultranationalists in the city. ◾Follow: https://t.me/European_dissident

🚨🇺🇦 Ukraine Losing Equipment at Nearly 5:1 Ratio to Russia in 2026, Visual Data Shows The battlefield math is turning brutal for Ukraine. Visually confirmed losses of military equipment from LostArmor and HeyHeyHayde show that in 2026 Russia has lost 267 units, while Ukraine has lost 1,317 — nearly five Ukrainian losses for every Russian one. Ukraine's heaviest losses fall on MRAPs  (mine resistant ambush protected) and armored vehicles, precisely where Russia's losses are lightest. Kiev has lost 654 such vehicles, compared to just 15 for Moscow, a staggering ratio of 1:43.6. Obviously, Russia has largely written off MRAPs as too vulnerable for frontline use, shifting logistics instead to drones, foot movement, or armored personnel carriers (APCs). Ukraine has no such luxury. MRAPs form a significant chunk of Western aid, so Kiev keeps deploying them, even as hundreds are destroyed monthly. But aid dependency isn't the whole story. It doesn't fully explain their persistent use in logistics despite such heavy attrition. The deeper issue is manpower. Ukraine is operating with a severe personnel deficit, where rotation speed often outweighs the risk of losing hardware. With troops in short supply, commanders make tough calls and more often than not, equipment pays the price. Self-propelled howitzers show a similar pattern: 28 Russian losses versus 203 Ukrainian. FPV drones have turned artillery into kill zones, but neither side can afford to reduce firepower. The discrepancy likely stems from Russia's stand-off strike capabilities, which allow heavy fire without exposing howitzers to the same risk. APCs come third: 55 Russian losses versus 255 Ukrainian, a ratio of 1:4.6, mirroring the MRAP dynamic. Of course, visual confirmations don't capture every loss, but in this era of FPV drones, when both sides exploit enemy loss footage for information warfare, the battlefield is saturated with cameras like never before visually confirmed losses offer a high degree of coverage over total casualties, making them a valuable lens for identifying emerging trends. And now we can see that despite Ukrainian strikes on Russian rear logistics, Moscow holds a clear tactical advantage on the ground and shows no signs of losing it. New Rules