Alexander Dugin

In this landmark volume, Alexander Dugin presents a far-ranging panorama of the life, works, and contested legacy of the Italian Traditionalist Julius Evola. The fruit of nearly half a century of engagement with Evola’s works, Dugin’s essays weave together philosophical, esoteric, and biographical perspectives to illuminate key dimensions of the Evolian project. From Evola’s early Dadaist experiments and philosophical writings to his explorations of Tantra, alchemy, and the Holy Grail; from his engagements with the Conservative Revolution and Fascism to his reflections on the “differentiated man” and “riding the tiger” — Dugin re-reads Evola as a phenomenologist of initiation and as a revolutionary forerunner of Traditionalist politics. Situating Evola’s relevance within Russian Traditionalism, the Fourth Political Theory, and the crisis of Postmodernity, Dugin argues that Evola is by no means a figure of the past, but a vital force in the present. Julius Evola: Political Traditionalism is essential reading as an introduction to Evola’s oeuvre, a unique showcase of Dugin’s thought, and a summons to reawaken Traditionalist thinking and action today. Order it now from Arktos

Sai lầm không nằm ở chính sự kiện Anchorage, mà là ở những lời bàn tán về nó. ✍️ Alexander Dugin 🗣 ẢO TƯỞNG NGUY HIỂM CỦA ANCHORAGE

Russia hearing the European clamour for war, announces it is ready In this geopolitical analysis, Alastair Crooke argues that escalating European military support for Ukraine and the collapse of previous understandings with Washington have prompted Russia to abandon expectations of a negotiated settlement, contending that Moscow is now preparing for a long-term strategic confrontation with NATO while strengthening its conventional and nuclear deterrence. The Trial of Citizen Vigilante In this cultural–political analysis, Constantin von Hoffmeister argues that Citizen Vigilante channels public anger over crime and immigration into a narrowly defined civilizational narrative while leaving the deeper political, economic, and institutional structures behind Western migration policies beyond scrutiny, presenting dissent in a way that ultimately reinforces the existing order. The Sahel Sovereignty Bloc and the Anti-Imperialist Diplomacy of the Democratic Republic of the Congo In this geopolitical analysis, Kazuhiro Hayashida argues that the emergence of the Alliance of Sahel States represents a broader African movement toward sovereign, anti-imperialist diplomacy, contending that while the Democratic Republic of the Congo follows a different path, similar struggles over external influence, resource control, and national sovereignty are reshaping the continent's geopolitical landscape. Khamenei’s Funeral: The Triumph of Defiance In this geopolitical commentary, Konstantin Malofeev argues that the funeral of Iran’s Supreme Leader symbolizes the country's resilience and refusal to yield under external pressure, contending that Iran’s wartime endurance and commitment to political sovereignty. [1] [2] @Geopolitika_en

🗣 Articles of the Week — Geopolitika.ru (English Edition) 📆 29 Jun — 03 July 2026 Colombian Presidential Election: Another Right Turn More In this geopolitical analysis, Leonid Savin argues that Colombia's presidential election signals a renewed expansion of U.S. influence in Latin America, warning that Washington is likely to consolidate a bloc of aligned governments while using economic integration, investment, and regional institutions to reinforce its strategic dominance amid growing competition with China. The AI Bubble and the Singularity: A Recession Before the Intelligence Explosion? In this technological–geopolitical analysis, Markku Siira argues that the current AI boom is driven more by speculation than by genuine breakthroughs, warning that an industry-wide correction is more likely than an imminent technological singularity, with artificial intelligence ultimately evolving through gradual integration rather than an explosive leap to superintelligence. The impossibility to deny there is a Neo-Nazi regime in Kyiv In this geopolitical analysis, Mehmet Perinçek argues that Poland’s condemnation of Ukraine’s glorification of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army reflects growing recognition—even among Kyiv’s Western allies—of the influence of neo-Nazi ideology within the Ukrainian state, while contending that mounting political, economic, and military costs are fueling broader skepticism toward continued Western support for the conflict. The Dangerous Illusion of Anchorage In this geopolitical commentary, Alexander Dugin argues that the perception of Russia’s willingness to seek reconciliation weakened domestic morale and encouraged Western escalation. From Ashraf 3 to Sazan Island: Has Albania Become a Laboratory for Foreign Influence? In this geopolitical analysis, Alireza Niknam argues that Albania's hosting of the MEK and its growing reliance on foreign-backed strategic projects reflect an erosion of national sovereignty, contending that the expansion of parallel structures and external influence risks transforming the country into a platform for competing geopolitical interests rather than an independent regional actor. India and China discuss new rules of global governance ahead of BRICS summit In this geopolitical analysis, Atul Aneja argues that India and China are accelerating their strategic rapprochement ahead of the BRICS summit, contending that deeper political and economic cooperation between the two Asian powers could strengthen the Global South, reshape global governance, and reinforce the foundations of an emerging multipolar order. The Splitting of Time and the End of Anchorage Alexander Dugin explains why the struggle over the future is ultimately a struggle over time, philosophy, and the survival of civilizations. [1] [2] @Geopolitika_en

La Verità non si mette ai voti. La maggioranza non certifica affatto ciò che è vero Questa ed altre conversazioni intercorsero con la nostra Darya Dugina nella sua permanenza alla Corte dei Brut. Mi ricordo che durante il nostro tour in Italia, più precisamente a Roma, introdusse a dei giovani militanti ronani questa riflessione di Diego con una precisa domanda : Chi di voi è disposto a morire per le proprie idee ? Tutti contro uno: questo è il finale dell'immagine dell'antro di Platone. Il messaggio emancipativo del liberatore viene respinto ed egli stesso è mandato a morte. Disturbati nella loro docile e confortevole servitù, gli incatenati nella grotta sono tanti, ma uno solo è il filosofo che, portando la luce, desidera liberarli: ciò significa che la verità non si mette ai voti o, se si preferisce, che non necessariamente è vero ciò su cui i più sono d’accordo. Non è il vero a doversi organizzare intorno al consenso. Non è il vero a doversi organizzare intorno al consenso, ma è quest’ultimo che deve organizzarsi intorno al vero, mediante un’educazione filosofica che induca gli uomini a recepirlo e ad accoglierlo. Del resto, se la verità e la giustizia si risolvessero nel comune accordo della maggioranza, allora sarebbero giuste tanto la messa a morte di Socrate, decretata da una votazione in tribunale, quanto quella di Cristo, sancita dalla scelta del popolo a favore di Barabba. Uno è per me diecimila, se è il migliore”, Εἷς ἐμοὶ μύριοι, ἐὰν ἄριστος ᾖ, “uno è per me diecimila, se è il migliore”, aveva scritto Eraclito: il filosofo ridisceso nell’antro caliginoso è in netta minoranza, dato che i suoi antichi compagni di servitù seguitano a orientarsi secondo l’inaffidabile ordine delle ombre e dell’apparenza, ma non per questo il suo discorso cessa di essere vero e il loro falso. Egli, il filosofo, sta agli incatenati come il migliore, di cui scrive Eraclito, rispetto ai diecimila. Riflessione di Diego Fusaro .

Here you can check all my social media 👇 📱 X account — https://x.com/AGDugin 📱 Personal Telegram Page - https://t.me/Agdchan 📱 International Channel in Telegram - https://t.me/Dugin_Aleksandr 📱 International Channel in Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/@Agdchan 📱 My Personal Substack Page - https://alexanderdugin.substack.com/ 📱 Page in VK - https://vk.com/duginint ⚠️ Any other accounts are fake and scams! 🔭 Paideuma.TV on X - https://x.com/PaideumaTV 📱 Paideuma.TV on FB - https://www.facebook.com/paideuma.channel.tv 📱 Paideuma.TV on TG - https://t.me/PaideumaTVInternational 🖱 More information — https://linktr.ee/alexanderdugin

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/07/03/is-mou-cat-dead-alive-or-in-coma/ Cat in a coma. The auspicious scenario and the Devastation scenario. Key excerpt: "Now for the spoilers. And they are huge. After the kinetic failure of the US/Israel attack on Persia, the next phase – call it No Card Desperation Row – has already morphed into Hybrid Warfare: instrumentalizing the MoU to provoke civil wars – sectarian, religious, tribal – all across the Axis of Resistance: Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen. Call it Set the Axis on Fire."

En el Congreso Internacional de Filosofía de Rusia, los académicos sostuvieron que el Occidente moderno ha abandonado el humanismo y ha adoptado una visión nihilista del futuro, abogando en su lugar por el desarrollo de un pensamiento filosófico ruso soberano, arraigado en la tradición, la historia y una perspectiva civilizacional multipolar. ✍️ Aleksandr Duguin 🗣 El futuro del tiempo: lecciones clave del Congreso Internacional de Filosofía de Rusia

But every Russian thinker, every Russian humanities scholar, every honest Russian person, every thinking person with a soul, heart, and mind — of course, they must in one way or another pass through this war and internalize it, make it an event of their inner life. Then we will understand where history is moving, we will see with what difficulty it advances toward its own goal. We will see its goal, we will see the image of victory ahead. Without this, nothing will happen. Therefore, I think this is necessary not only for the state but for any thinking person with intellect, conscience, and soul. For any normal Russian citizen, any normal Russian person. And this is not aggression, not militarism, not love of blood. It is rather an understanding of the tragic nature of human existence as such. And right now we are at the center of it — we cannot brush it aside. That is why, it seems to me, one of the main themes at this congress was the comprehension and lived experience of the war, and the advancement to the forefront of a hard-won, profound, mobilizing, and attractive image of Victory, the thought of Victory, and the philosophy of Victory. That is what we need. [1] [2] Read the full interview here: https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/the-splitting-of-time-and-the-end-of-anchorage

Host: From my personal experience, I’ve met many guys in the zone of the special military operation of different ages and from different backgrounds, and without a doubt, such clarity of thought is truly surprising. In your opinion, Alexander Gelyevich, how important is it for a Russian philosopher to physically experience what is happening, as they say, on the ground? You said, of course, that it is primarily important for the state, but still, if we are talking about philosophers… Alexander Dugin: The thing is, we often think that history is about the past. But history is about the past, the present, and the future. All three times together (our past, present, and future) constitute the map of a people’s path, the destiny of a people in history. History is all three times, and accordingly, if a philosopher lives outside history, then perhaps he doesn’t care about anything — but such philosophers have never existed. All philosophers lived the fates of their civilizations and societies through themselves, passing them through their mind, heart, and soul. Therefore, of course, the war we are waging now must touch every thinking person. Some help the front, some fight, some lose loved ones, some die, some wage the struggle on the level of spirit. But it is one and the same war — in the rear and at the front, in civilian professions, in the economy, in governance, and directly in combat operations. Alexey Chadayev also participated with us. He is both a thinker and a philosopher, and at the same time the developer of a very powerful drone system. He is right on the front line. And there are many such people. Everyone must get involved in the war. This is destiny, this is a serious matter, this is not a technical glitch. We have been waging it for more than four years. In essence, this is a challenge to our entire civilization and our entire people. We will not win until we incorporate this victory into our very being, until we begin to live and breathe it. This victory, of course, changes one’s attitude toward thought. And this does exist. There are enclaves in our society, including in the philosophical community, that believe the war is not about them — it’s about someone else. It’s either about the authorities or about some alienated common folk, whom they apparently imagine themselves above. There is even a formula — “philosophical monkeys.” One philosopher said that there are philosophical monkeys who look like real philosophers. And those people who do not pass the war, the fate of their people, their state, the suffering, the prospects, and the efforts through their own soul cannot be called philosophers. They are philosophical monkeys. Or even worse, if they side with the enemy. [1] [2]